Not So Private Property?: Clean Water Restoration Act Raises Fears of Land Grab - I Was Taken!
      Home    Forum    New posts    Register Dark
I Was Taken! is the source on the countries disgruntled voters
 

Not So Private Property?: Clean Water Restoration Act Raises Fears of Land Grab


Go Back   I Was Taken! > General Discussions > OFF TOPIC

 
LinkBack Thread Tools Display Modes
  #1  
Old 12-15-2009, 09:38 AM
montec's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: ND
Posts: 859
FOXNews.com

Upwards of 40 percent of all land in the United States is already under some form of government control or ownership -- 800 million to 900 million acres out of America's total 2.2 billion acres.
The government now appears poised to wield greater control over private property on a number of fronts. The battle over private property rights has intensified since 2005, when the Supreme Court ruled in the Kelo v. City of New London case that the government could take property from one group of private landowners and give it to another.
Outraged over that ruling and a series of recent efforts by government to wield greater control over private property, citizens are fighting back. Fox News' Shannon Bream takes a fair and balanced look at the controversy in a three-part series.


The Clean Water Restoration Act currently pending in the U.S. Senate could reach to control even a "seasonal puddle" on private property.
Eleven senators and 17 representatives in the U.S. House have sent a letter to Majority Leader Harry Reid and Speaker Nancy Pelosi blasting the measure as one of the boldest property grab attempts of all time.
This bill is described by opponents as a sweeping overhaul of the Clean Water Act that could threaten both physical land and jobs by wiping out some farmers entirely.
"Right now, the law says that the Environmental Protection Agency is in charge of all navigable water," said Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo., chairman of the Senate Western Caucus and an opponent of the bill.
"Well, this bill removes the word 'navigable,' so for ranchers and farmers who have mud puddles, prairie potholes -- anything from snow melting on their land -- all of that water will now come under the regulation of the Army Corps of Engineers and the Environmental Protection Agency," he said.
Barrasso said the federal government's one-size-fits-all approach doesn't work in the west where the Rocky Mountain states have gone even further than Washington to protect land, water and the environment.
"The government wants control of all water -- that also means that they want control over all of our land including the private property rights of people from the Rocky Mountain west, the western caucus and the entire United States," he said.
But Jan Goldman-Carter of the National Wildlife Foundation said fears by ranchers and farmers are unfounded.
"That amended language is very clear that it preserves long standing exemptions for ongoing agricultural practices, forest roads. There are a number of very generous exemptions in there particularly for ranchers and farmers that I know have been worried about the effect of this legislation, but in fact those worries are largely unfounded," she said.
Goldman-Carter added that the United States has long regulated streams and other waterways that aren't 'navigable' by boat because to do otherwise would be to allow dumping into smaller water sources that lead to the larger ones used for drinking water and other purposes.
"I can't imagine anyone wanting to walk down to the stream and dump their oil or paint," she said. "Even if they did they're not going to be enforced against now and they never were, there simply isn't the ability to do that."
Aside from striking "navigable," the bill defines U.S. water as "all waters subject to the ebb and flow of the tide, the territorial seas and all interstate and intrastate waters and their tributaries, including lakes, rivers, streams (including intermittent streams), mudflats, sandflats, wetlands, sloughs, prairie potholes, wet meadows, playa lakes, natural ponds and all impoundments of the foregoing, to the fullest extent that these waters."
It adds that any "activities affecting these waters are subject to the legislative power of Congress under the Constitution."
The legislation, introduced by Wisconsin Democratic Sen Russ Feingold, has the support of 24 senators. It passed the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee in June but has not been scheduled for a floor vote, though it could be tacked onto other legislation as an amendment.


Search Results - THOMAS (Library of Congress)
Reply With Quote
  #2  
Old 12-15-2009, 10:51 AM
The Master's Avatar
Hunting RINOs with my 6.8
ΜΟΛΩΝ ΛΑΒΕ
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 3,289
This is not a good thing.
Reply With Quote
  #3  
Old 12-15-2009, 10:58 AM
montec's Avatar
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: ND
Posts: 859
They can come knocking on my door and unless they have cash I aint going no where and they will meet my flu vacination.
Reply With Quote
  #4  
Old 12-15-2009, 01:35 PM
nigglewiggle60's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2008
Location: Oakhurst, CA
Posts: 418
Don't you wish that the fed would stay as they were intended and the states would not ask for fed help and learn to take care of themselves. It's like a 30 year old who still lives at home and has to be told to poop only in the toilet. And when they don't the fed comes in and "cleans" it up.
__________________
"We defend freedom here or it is gone. There is no place for us to run, only to make a stand. And if we fail, I think we face telling our children, and our children's children, what it was we found more precious than freedom. Because I am sure that someday - if we fail in this - there will be a generation that will ask."
- Ronald Wilson Reagan
Reply With Quote
  #5  
Old 12-19-2009, 06:11 PM
Politicus's Avatar
Senior Member
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 672
They want it all and they will get it all unless the sheeple wake up.
__________________
www.politicitis.com
http://politicitis.blogspot.com

On Freeman Radio Monday through Friday @ 6pm Central. www.freemanradio.com
Reply With Quote
 



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 09:26 PM. Powered by vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Content Relevant URLs by vBSEO 3.2.0

1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16